4 min Read Time<\/p>\n
Marketing budgets are under pressure in 2026. The OWM Trend Barometer shows: 70 percent of member companies are growing – but most expect advertising budgets to stagnate. At the same time, according to the ANA Programmatic Study, 64 cents of every programmatic advertising dollar vanishes into adtech fees and MFA sites. For CFOs, communication thus becomes an investment decision with measurable risk. The question is no longer whether content works – but whether its impact can be proven.<\/strong><\/p>\n In 2023, the ANA (Association of National Advertisers) conducted a deep-dive analysis of the programmatic advertising market. The findings are alarming for any CFO: $123 million in ad spend analyzed, 35.5 billion impressions evaluated, 21 member companies involved. Result: Of every dollar flowing into a DSP, only 36 cents reaches the end consumer. 29 percent is consumed by adtech transaction costs. Another 35 percent disappears into MFA sites (Made for Advertising) and non-measurable environments.<\/p>\n Scaled across the entire open-web programmatic market – $88 billion – the math is stark: $20 billion in annual waste. This is not a rounding error. It\u2019s a structural problem that would never be tolerated in any other investment category.<\/p>\n Content marketing faces a similar challenge. The Content Marketing Institute\u2019s 2025 B2B Benchmarks report documents that 58 percent of B2B marketers report revenue growth driven by content marketing. Yet 56 percent say they cannot attribute ROI. For a CFO, that means: Half of the content budget might<\/em> be working – or it might not. No one can say for sure.<\/p>\n A CFO would never purchase machinery whose utilization couldn\u2019t be measured. Nor would they sign a cloud-service contract without an SLA – or hire a consultant without defined deliverables. Yet much of B2B communication operates precisely this way: content is published, impressions are counted – and everyone hopes it works.<\/p>\n Dentsu and Lumen Research\u2019s 2024 Attention Economy Study confirmed that Attention has 1.4\u00d7 greater explanatory power for brand recall than traditional viewability metrics. Integral Ad Science goes further: campaigns with high Attention generate up to 130 percent more conversions than low-Attention impressions. Impressions measure whether something was served. Attention measures whether someone looked. Verified Reads measure whether someone read<\/em>. For a CFO, only the last metric qualifies as proof of investment.<\/p>\n The AMEC Barcelona Principles 3.0 – the international standard for communications measurement – explicitly declared Advertising Value Equivalency (AVE) invalid. The industry standard now demands outcome-based measurement – not output counting. Anyone still presenting AVE equivalents to their CFO is using a metric the industry itself has declared obsolete.<\/p>\n \n“Impact is an outcome. And outcomes can be demanded.” The concept is simple: A company books a defined number of Verified Reads. If the target isn\u2019t met, the publisher adjusts distribution until the agreed performance is delivered. Risk lies with the publisher – not the customer. In CFO language: guaranteed performance instead of sunk cost.<\/p>\n A quick calculation makes the logic tangible:<\/p>\n Traditional campaign:<\/strong> \u20ac5,000 media budget. Outcome: 8,400 impressions, unknown reading time, unknown audience quality. ROI: unmeasurable. Risk: 100 percent borne by the customer.<\/p>\n Performance Publishing<\/a>:<\/strong> \u20ac4,990 campaign budget. Outcome: 2,500 guaranteed Verified Reads (30 seconds reading time or 50 percent scroll depth). Cost-per-Verified-Read: \u20ac2.00. For comparison: A traditional B2B CPC ranges from \u20ac3-\u20ac8 – without any reading guarantee. Risk: borne by the publisher (Make-Good guarantee).<\/p>\n The difference for the CFO? The traditional campaign is an expense. The performance campaign is an investment with a defined return. Make-Good transforms OPEX risk into predictable, deliverable performance.<\/p>\n 1. What share of our media budget actually reaches our target audience?<\/strong> The ANA study shows just 36 percent in programmatic. Contextual placement in trade publications delivers significantly higher reach – because there\u2019s no chain of intermediaries and no MFA sites involved.<\/p>\n 2. Can we quantify the ROI of our content investments?<\/strong> 56 percent of B2B marketers say no (CMI 2025). Verified Reads as a KPI solves this: Every campaign delivers defined performance, a measurable cost-per-read, and Make-Good assurance.<\/p>\n 3. Who bears the risk if targets aren\u2019t met?<\/strong> In traditional media planning: the customer. In Performance Publishing with Make-Good: the publisher. For the CFO, that\u2019s the decisive distinction. Guaranteed performance reduces investment risk to zero.<\/p>\n 4. Is our content budget compliant with industry standards?<\/strong> The AMEC Barcelona Principles 3.0 have invalidated AVE as a metric. Anyone still calculating internally using advertising equivalency values is relying on a metric rejected by their own industry association. Meanwhile, the Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Report 2025 reveals: 64 percent of B2B decision-makers trust thought-leadership content more than traditional marketing materials. Budget allocated to thought leadership is therefore not only measurable – but demonstrably effective.<\/p>\n HubSpot\u2019s State of Marketing Report 2026 documents that 34 percent of total B2B marketing budgets flow into content marketing. 46 percent of B2B marketers expect this share to grow further in 2026. Rising budgets coupled with stagnant measurability increase CFO risk. Performance Publishing – with Verified Reads and Make-Good – resolves this equation.<\/p>\n GumGum and SPARK Neuro further confirm: Contextually placed content in editorial environments achieves double the ad recall of behaviorally targeted ads. That means: \u20ac1 spent in a trade magazine delivers more impact than \u20ac1 spent across a programmatic network. For the CFO, that\u2019s not a marketing argument – it\u2019s an allocation decision.<\/p>\n The Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Report 2025 delivers the sales proof: 75 percent of respondents said a specific thought-leadership piece prompted them to research a product they hadn\u2019t previously considered. 79 percent would more readily advocate for a vendor during an RFP process if that vendor consistently publishes high-quality content. Content in trusted trade publications<\/a> is thus not a soft image factor – but a measurable pipeline driver.<\/p>\n CFOs decide on investments – not marketing channels. But when marketing budgets become investments with measurable returns, evaluation changes. Performance Publishing – with Verified Reads and Make-Good guarantees – makes content impact planable, comparable, and risk-free for the customer.<\/p>\n The question for the CFO is simple: Would you buy machinery whose output can\u2019t be measured? A cloud service without an SLA? Then you shouldn\u2019t approve a media budget whose impact no one can quantify.<\/p>\n Depending on the package, the Cost-per-Verified-Read ranges from \u20ac1.00 to \u20ac2.00. For comparison: A B2B CPC in the programmatic space costs \u20ac3-\u20ac8 – without any guarantee that the click leads to meaningful reading time. Verified Reads are thus cheaper per genuine reader engagement than traditional click-based models.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n Make-Good guarantee: The publisher adjusts distribution until the agreed number of Verified Reads is achieved. Risk rests entirely with the publisher. The customer incurs no additional costs.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n 30 seconds of reading time on the article – or 50 percent scroll depth. This measurement follows the principles of the Attention Economy: Dentsu and Lumen Research show that 14 seconds of attention nearly doubles brand recall. Verified Reads – set at 30 seconds – sit well above this efficacy threshold.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n No. The entry-level package starts at \u20ac890 (SEO-Kick). The mid-tier package (Reads-Boost) costs \u20ac2,490 and includes 1,200 guaranteed Verified Reads. SMEs and agencies alike can enter without large upfront budgets – and scale as needed.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n Because content budgets are rising (34 percent of B2B marketing budgets, per HubSpot 2026) – but measurability isn\u2019t keeping pace (56 percent can\u2019t attribute ROI). Performance Publishing makes this growing budget planable, comparable, and risk-free.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n Header Image Source: Pexels \/ Recha Oktaviani<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Marketing budgets are under pressure in 2026. The OWM Trend Barometer shows: 70 percent of member companies are growing – but most expect advertising budgets to stagnate. At the same time, according to the ANA Programmatic Study, 64 cents of every programmatic advertising dollar vanishes into adtech fees and MFA sites. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":205,"featured_media":89737,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"make-good","_yoast_wpseo_title":"Make-Good: Protect your media investment with confidence","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"Digitalisierung, KI & Business: Boost growth & cut costs. Learn how to future-proof your finances today!","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-adv":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-image":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-image-id":0,"_yoast_wpseo_twitter-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-image":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-image-id":0,"featured_post_sortierung":0,"featured_post":0,"pre_headline":"","bildquelle":"","teasertext":"","language":"de","_evm_translation_lang":"","_wp_old_slug":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1156],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-digital-business-future","entry"],"evm_reading_time_minutes":9,"wpml_language":"en","wpml_translation_of":89736,"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n
\n
Where Budgets Disappear<\/h2>\n
Why Impressions Are Not Proof of Investment<\/h2>\n
\nMBF Media Editorial Team<\/cite>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\nMake-Good: Transferring Risk from Customer to Publisher<\/h2>\n
What the CFO Should Ask the CMO<\/h2>\n
From Cost Center to Measurable Value Contribution<\/h2>\n
Conclusion: Media Budgets with a Guarantee<\/h2>\n
Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n
How much does a Verified Read cost?<\/strong><\/summary>\n
What happens if the Reads aren\u2019t delivered?<\/strong><\/summary>\n
How is a Verified Read measured?<\/strong><\/summary>\n
Is Performance Publishing only for large enterprises?<\/strong><\/summary>\n
Why should the CFO care?<\/strong><\/summary>\n
Further Reading Across the Network<\/h2>\n
\n